JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 3, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Juan Jose Cruz Cuevas

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Recurso de súplica.

La demanda se rechazó porque la norma cuestionada era un Decreto Ley expedido por el Presidente de la República en el marco de la implementación del Acuerdo Final para la Terminación del Conflicto y la Construcción de una Paz Estable y Duradera, la tuvo un control automático, único e integral que hizo tránsito a cosa juzgada absoluta, en concordancia con lo señalado por la Corporación en la Sentencia C-174/17.

Por no lograr desvirtuar el examen efectuado por el Magistrado Sustanciador y dada la inexistencia de razones para despojar de la fuerza de cosa juzgada constitucional a lo resuelto en la precitada providencia de constitucionalidad, la Sala Plena decidió CONFIRMAR el auto recurrido.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el auto del 7 de marzo de 2019, por el cual se rechazó la demanda presentada por el ciudadano Juan José Cruz Cuevas contra el artículo 12 del Decreto Ley 893 de 2017, "Por el cual se crean los Programas de Desarrollo con Enfoque Territorial ?PDET", dentro del expediente con número de radicación D-13109.
  2. SEGUNDO. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.